Shareholder Concentration: A Force For Good?

Is Shareholder Concentration a good or bad thing?

One of the key arguments against passive investing is the lack of influence shareholders have on the actions of company management.

The argument is that if a significant percentage of a company is owned by one large passive investor, such as Blackrock or Vanguard, then smaller shareholders will be overlooked by management and the lack of interest by passive owners will lead to corporate governance issues.

Vanguard has tried to allay these concerns by introducing an "Investment Stewardship program," which guides the investment manager's proxy voting and engagement activity.
Shareholder Concentration . . .

SORRY!

This content is exclusively for paying members. Access all of our content on including years of timeless investment news and in depth analysis for only a few dollars a month by signing up here while also supporting quality content and journalism, or learn more about our premium content here

If you are subscribed and having an account error please clear cache and then cookies if that does not work email support@valuewalk.com and we will get back to you as quick as humanly possible


Saved Articles
X
TextTExtLInkTextTExtLInk

Are you a smart investor? Join tens of thousands of sophisticated investor reading our authoritative free newsletter

* indicates required


Congrats! Are you a smart person?

We have an exclusive targeted for being a sophisticated and loyal reader.

Sign up today and get three months free

Use coupon code vip19 or click on the button below

Limited time offer only ENDS 10/31/2019 or after next 25 20 subscribers take advantage whichever comes first – please do not share this discount with others

 

0