Social Security Is Facing A $42.1 Trillion Shortfall, Trustees Report SaysFEE
Every year, the Social Security Administration issues a “Trustees Report” that summarizes the program’s financing. So every year (see 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, etc.) I cut through all the verbiage and focus the numbers that really matter.
Annual Spending and Revenue
First, here’s the data from Table VI.G9 showing annual spending and annual revenue, and the numbers are adjusted for inflation. Everything to the left of the vertical red line is historical data. Everything to the right is an estimate based on “intermediate” economic and demographic projections.
The bad news is that there’s a never-ending increase in the program’s fiscal burden.
The only good news is that the country presumably will be much richer in the future, so we’ll have more income to pay all those taxes and finance all that spending.
That being said, the fiscal burden is projected to increase faster than our income, so the economic burden of Social Security will increase over time.
But there’s also a wild card to consider. Simply stated, we have more data from Table VI.G9 that shows the program has a giant, ever-expanding deficit.
Here are the grim numbers (though not quite as grim as last year when the cumulative shortfall was $43.7 trillion). Once again, everything to the left of the line is historical data and everything to the right is a projection.
The obvious takeaway is that the program is bankrupt.
Indeed, a private pension fund with these numbers would have been shut down a long time ago. And its executives would be in prison for running a Ponzi Scheme.
Social Security Crisis
Politicians won’t put themselves in prison, of course, but they eventually will be forced to address Social Security’s huge shortfall. If nothing else, the so-called Trust Fund (which isn’t a real Trust Fund since it is filled with IOUs) runs out of money in 2035.
The interesting question is what sort of “solution” they choose when the crisis occurs.
Sadly, many politicians are gravitating to a plan to impose ever-higher taxes to prop up the system.
A far better approach is personal retirement accounts. I’ve written favorably about the Australian system, the Chilean system, the Hong Kong system, the Swiss system, the Dutch system, the Swedish system. Heck, I even like the system in the Faroe Islands.
The bottom line is that there’s been a worldwide revolution in favor of private savings and the United States is falling behind.
P.S. If you have some statist friends and family who get confused by numbers, here’s a set of cartoons that shows the need for Social Security reform.
P.P.S. As I explain in this video, reform does not mean reducing benefits for current retirees, or even older workers.
Daniel J. Mitchell is a Washington-based economist who specializes in fiscal policy, particularly tax reform, international tax competition, and the economic burden of government spending. He also serves on the editorial board of the Cayman Financial Review.
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.