Aramco: Energy Intervention – ValueWalk Premium
Energy Intervention

Aramco: Energy Intervention

Saudi oil company Aramco may be getting all the headlines but, for the third consecutive week, oil prices measured by the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) benchmark price managed to advance. Part of the reason is the general rise in risk assets as hopes for a trade deal rise and signs emerge of improving economic data. This is the longest run of weekly gains since mid-April, which saw oil prices drop almost 17% from an April peak. This goes to show just how much of an impact of a trade war and demand fears have had on the market. Besides the trade front, the market is also beginning to focus on the upcoming OPEC meeting in early December. There have been reports that OPEC+ will look to extend the current cuts until June from March. Rather than rely on a wait-and-see approach, the oil cartel may look to get ahead of the significant amount of new production coming online from non-OPEC countries such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S. Chart 1 shows just how much of a burden OPEC has had to shoulder. Total production is down significantly, led by Iran (involuntary) and Saudi Arabia (voluntary).

Q3 2019 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Energy Intervention

It’s not lost on us that a large reason for this supply management is the upcoming Aramco IPO, set for December 4, and to begin trading domestically on December 11. Prospective pricing shows that they will miss the target $2 trillion valuation initially hoped for.

Though we’ve seen three weeks of gains, oil prices have been fairly rangebound – stuck between $50 and $60 since early June. Currently, we’re nearing the higher end of the range. Besides near-term sentiment, the oil market is largely fundamentally driven. We’re beginning to see some interesting developments on both the supply and demand side of the equation.

Energy Intervention


Inventories were in the news last week, with a much larger-than- expected draw coming out of Cushing Oklahoma, falling to the lowest level in about a month. U.S. DOE Inventory levels, as seen in Chart 2, are currently at the low end of the five-year range. Despite inventories running at the low end of the range, there are a number of elements that are pointing to ample supply. The WTI futures curve (Chart 3) is steepening deeper into backwardation. Front-month contracts have risen significantly over the past few weeks, but the longer-dated contracts have been rather sticky, anchoring around the marginal cost of supply from shale production.

Energy Intervention

U.S. shale oil has outperformed expectations, but with continued talk of more financial prudence in the recent earnings season, we see a high likelihood for less stellar growth than in years past. Along with a newfound financial discipline, there are a number of key drivers that point to a slowing of U.S. oil production growth. These include limited capital availability and resource maturity.

Energy Intervention

Chart 4 shows that total U.S. production is growing, but at a much slower pace. What’s worth noting is that rig counts have fallen 24% over the past year. This is significant and is an early sign of what’s to come (Chart 4). Shale productivity gains have also moved into the later innings. Top locations have already been drilled, and there is distinct potential of seeing peak shale production in 2020 given higher decline rates in less than optimal locations.


Oil demand growth has fallen, given the recent slowing in global economic growth. The overhang of falling potential demand far out into the future due to changing demand habits will be a long-term constant for the industry. But its death has been greatly exaggerated. The truth of the matter is that as the global population grows, and emerging economies play catch up with developed nations, the outlook – at least in the short and medium term – is positive (despite what Greta may have you believe). Energy demand is expected to increase in every five-year period to 2040, according to the recent OPEC World Oil Outlook, though the pace of demand growth will likely slow. And an OPEC outlook is perhaps not the most objective source. In the near term, global consumption is at risk, if what we’ve seen in the manufacturing space fails to stabilize and potentially worsen.

Energy Intervention

For the most part, analysts and traders are relatively neutral on WTI crude prices. Analysts and traders are neutral on WTI crude futures, a Bloomberg survey showed. Of 16 surveyed, 56% were neutral, 31% were bullish and 13% were bearish. Barring an imminent recession, $60 feels like the sweet spot with minor gyrations around it. Our outlook for crude prices is not incredibly bullish, but $60 crude is profitable for North American energy producers, and it is the massive disconnect between the physical market and equity prices that is most intriguing.

Energy sector

While there is little debate that the energy macro backdrop looks challenging with increasing supply and demand somewhat squishy, for investors the more salient question is whether equity valuations and current stock price levels are appropriate. Is the equity market over or under-reacting, or does it have it right? That is where potential investment opportunities or pitfalls lay.

Energy Intervention

Looking back to periods when oil was $100 is of little investment use; the likelihood of such a repeat at this stage of the market cycle seems almost impossible (unless a material supply disruption). But even looking at stock price performance since the crash in oil prices in 2015, should interest the value investors of the world. This is more so in Canada, as the Canadian Exploration & Production index has dropped 50% over the past three years (Chart 6). Pipeline constraints, increased regulation, lack of foreign investment, the list of reasons goes on. As a general rule, share prices don’t get cut in half unless there is lots of bad news. So, has the lack of love or distaste for Canadian energy gone too far?

Energy Intervention

One of my early career mentors, Dunnery Best, had a simple rule of thumb: when E&Ps (exploration & production companies) are trading below 5x cash flow, you should plug your nose and buy them. At least that is how I recollect – it has been a while. Today, the Canadian E&Ps are trading at 4.8x and the U.S. E&Ps are a little higher at 5.6x (Charts 7 & 8). This is cheap, for a host of good reasons, but cheap nonetheless.

Energy Intervention

What Happens Next?

Investing is all about attempting to calculate probabilities and the magnitude of the impact on share prices. For instance, there are probably two general scenarios that could happen next:

1) Recession. If we have one in the next year, that is not going to be good for oil prices nor energy share prices, even if valuations are currently very low.

2) Global growth improves. If the slowing growth abates, and this goes down as the third soft patch of this aging long cycle, this sector will fly. Lower quality, weak balance sheets would rise the most, followed by higher quality.

We are currently tilted more towards scenario #2. However, these outcomes could potentially alter if the decline rates from shale continue to accelerate (bullish), OPEC changes its tune (bearish), and if Canada can build a new pipeline (bullish).

There are a lot of moving parts as energy is either a value trap or potentially one of the great opportunities for the year ahead. We continue to wrestle with this question but, as a general rule, the lower the price and valuation, the less risk there should be. Time will tell how this one plays out.

Article by Derek Benedet, Craig Basinger, Chris Kerlow, Alexander Tjiang – RichardsonGMP

Saved Articles