Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.
Q3 hedge fund letters, conference, scoops etc
The brilliance of Regulation Best Interest (RBI) is how it sidesteps the 1940 Advisers Act to marginalize fiduciary duties for retail investors. It proclaims a broker suitability-styled standard to be in the best interests of investors. Industry advocates say it’s a strong investor protection rule.
It’s not. It’s the opposite.
RBI rejects centuries-old principles guiding the prudent care of someone else’s money. This is implicit in RBI’s numerous unstated assumptions, such as that sales and advice are virtually the same – and in explicitly stated assumptions, such as brokers and investors will be harmed if brokers avoid conflicts. RBI sounds loud Tsunami sirens.
SEC commissioners, scholars, investor advocates, fiduciary advisors and investors have objected. Their opposition is important and necessary, but insufficient.
Why? RBI is a Washington insiders’ story. It’s the opposite of reaching a tipping point. After a decade of “small things,” RBI is now only championed by a small elite cohort – perhaps 100 or fewer policymakers, attorneys, industry executives and lobbyists.
RBI cries out for first responders to reverse course and reclaim a real fiduciary standard. Let’s wage the battle outside Washington and on Main Street and with sports, cultural and business leaders. Right, center or left, it doesn’t matter because outside Washington and Wall Street the fiduciary standard is not some complex formula. It’s common sense.
First responders should reach across the aisle to those who openly talk of problems in finance. AEI’s Arthur Brooks, R Street’s Alex Pollock and former CATO CEO John Allison should be among them. They won’t agree with everything fiduciary. But, they will accept a cogent argument that significant steps are required so that Wells Fargo is not always the poster child for financial services.
This is easier than it seems. The case for a real fiduciary standard is obvious, so much it’s embarrassing to say it out loud. It’s common sense. Financial planner Dan Moisand compares it to brushing your teeth! Not a heavy lift.
More broadly, the case for a real fiduciary standard is a case for the values and principles that are vital, self-evident and indisputable – like the values that inspired our nation’s founders.
Broadway’s hit, Hamilton, tells the story of courage, trust and competence in establishing the nation’s credit and credibility. It’s an important story of first values and principles.
Fast forward 200 years. Republican, Democrat or Independent, look at Bush 41. George Herbert Walker Bush’s life reflected fiduciary duties of loyalty, due care and utmost good faith in practice. Turning principles into practices; virtues into actions.
“A man of admirable private and public character who believed in government service for the good of the country,” said the Wall Street Journal. His biographer, Jon Meacham wrote, “Bush was a steward, not a seer, and made no apologies for his preference for action – steady, prudent, and thoughtful – over ideology.”
Read the full article by Knut Rostad, Advisor Perspectives
