[Archives] Ben Graham’s Net Current Asset Values: A Performance Update

HFA Padded
HFA Staff
Published on
Updated on

Benjamin Graham’s impact on the investment world cannot be measured. His favorite approach, value investing, is still widely used. NAV and NCAV methods are used as primary screening tools for finding undervalued stocks. In understanding the concept of net asset value (NAV) we need to dig deeper into Graham’s mind when he developed this investment method.

The NAV method is used as a quantitative metric and It provides a broad estimate of a company’s net worth. The NCAV focuses on a company’s short-term financial health and liquidity. Graham advocated for the use of NAV, and later his variant called NCAV. With these two methods, the goal is to identify stocks that are at least 30% below their NAV.

Once the undervalued stocks are identified the investor has a margin of safety and a hedge from potential market fluctuations. Graham later used his trademark net net stock strategy when he targeted stocks below their NCAV value. This concept is still frequently used but to fully grasp all these terms we will need to go into detail.

Importance of Ben Graham’s Approach to Investing

The investment vision of Ben Graham is still seen today. He is regarded as a father of value investing, but his influence doesn’t stop there. He implemented the margin of safety and NCAV into his often defensive and long-term investment strategy. This was a winning strategy for him and many of his disciples.

Graham advised investors to look at the long-term benefits and invest in companies with strong fundamentals. He was always against following the herd and rushing into investing with currently popular companies.

One of the cornerstones of his approach is fundamental analysis. Graham pointed out in both his lectures and books to focus on company fundamentals. A good analysis is never done without checking financial statements, earnings, and dividends. These factors play a crucial role in making an informed investment decision.

He was the first major investor that popularize the concept of intrinsic value. When calculating it the investor gets the real value of the company based on its fundamentals. He developed several methods for calculating intrinsic value like discounted cash flow and asset-based valuation.

Finally, he wanted to make the investment landscape accessible to more people. Graham believed that education was crucial in this process. Investors need to have the proper information and knowledge before investing. This helped in building a more ethical and transparent investing sector that is worth fighting for.

Take A Look At The Intelligent Investor Summary (BY BENJAMIN GRAHAM):

How to Calculate Net Current Assets

Calculating net current assets involves subtracting total current liabilities from the current assets of the company. To do so, you need for starters to gather all relevant information. Those include finding the company’s balance sheets or financial statements. Next, identify the values for current assets and liabilities.

To identify current total assets you should look for

  • Cash and cash equivalents. Those include cash on hand and in the bank. Also, finding highly liquid investments that can easily be converted to cash is considered a cash equivalent
  • Accounts receivable. Goods or services that are already delivered or money owned by the customers are regarded as current assets
  • Company inventory. Those include products or services that are finished and ready to sell, any raw materials or work-in-progress goods
  • Prepaid expenses. If a company is paying insurance or rent and is paid in advance it is identified as a current asset.

Identifying current total liabilities include:

  • Accounts payable. These refer to the money owed in case the goods and services are bought
  • Short-term debt. All bank loans and credits that are due in the next year
  • Accrued expenses. In this group are expenses that are being incurred but not yet paid. Typically those refer to salaries and taxes.

Once you identified assets and liabilities, to calculate NCA subtract liabilities from the assets.

Historical Significance of Ben Graham’s Net Asset Value

The historical significance of Ben Graham’s net asset value made an impact both on the academic and practical sides of finance. It helped solidify the foundation of value investing, and it brought the quantitative analysis closer to the individual investor. The key significance is reflected in these aspects:

  • It helped pioneer a value-investing framework

Graham’s focus on NAV and NCAV helped in developing the key elements for the value investing approach. The NCAV helped to identify the undervalued stocks and provided a margin of safety. This approach also pushed toward fundamental analysis and long-term investment perspective.

 

This view was in contrast with the preferred market sentiment-driven approaches. Graham wanted to promote disciplined and research-based decision-making.

  • It democratized financial analysis

Graham’s use of NAV that can be precisely calculated brought quantitative analysis closer to individual investors. He provided a usable tool to identify stocks below their market price. This helped retail investors to conduct independent research and test professional valuations.

This resulted in the creation of a more informed market environment. It also brought higher transparency and more responsible financial reporting.

  • It brought measurable results

Graham and his followers like Buffett used these strategies for decades. They consistently outperformed market averages with the use of value investing. NAV and especially NCAV were crucial parts of the value investing approach, and they showed their usability.

Comparing Ben Graham’s Approach to Other Investment Strategies

 Contrasting NAV with Other Valuation Methods

Ben Graham always opted for the use of a multi-faceted approach to valuation. He used NAV as a starting point and then incorporated other methods like discounted cash flow, market price, and price-to-earnings ratio. He used all these methods together with qualitative analysis of the business model of the company, its prospects, and its competitive landscape.

The NAV as a tool for identifying undervalued assets has its share of positives and negatives.

Positives of NAV:

  • It provides a real, quantitative measure of a company’s underlying value, based on its tangible assets
  • By buying assets below their net worth it offered a margin of safety
  • With the help of the balance sheet, it is easy to calculate it.

 

Negatives of NAV:

  • It doesn’t take into account future earning potential. Also, it disregards intangible assets like brand value or intellectual property
  • It can show misleading results for companies that have a lot of non-current assets or liabilities
  • NAV is overfocused on short-term financial health, and it doesn’t include the potential for long-term growth.

Other methods that Graham used were:

  • Discounted cash flow (DCF). He viewed this method as a valuable tool for estimating the current value of a company’s future cash flows. He advised other investors to use it with caution because he didn’t want to focus on projections. Graham often noted the difficulty of predicting long-term cash flows
  • Market price. Graham saw market price as a sign of investor sentiment, and not primarily as a reflection of intrinsic value. He restrained investors from buying into inflated prices that are driven by emotions and speculation
  • Price-to-Earnings ratio (P/E). When there was a need to compare relative valuations within the industry Graham used the P/E ratio. However, he advised the use of the P/E ratio as a tool with other factors like the growth potential of the company and quality of earnings.

 Pros and Cons of Ben Graham’s Approach

Pros of Graham’s approach are:

  • Focus on intrinsic value. The core of his approach which includes the use of NCAV, is identifying and buying stocks below their intrinsic value. The NCAV method goes even further and aims for stocks with a liquidation value. This tactic creates a shield against potential losses in case the stock price doesn’t rise
  • The use of quantitative metrics. Graham’s focus was always on using concrete metrics. All his approaches offer a straightforward way of measurement like NCAV, and P/E ratios. This way he identified minimum-value stocks through a structured and objective approach
  • Emphasis on margin of safety. While identifying NCAV stocks, he was hedging from unforeseen risks, thus minimizing the chance of losing money
  • Proven track record. Not only Graham but his student Warren Buffett used these methods with great success.

Cons of Graham’s approach are:

  • Oversimplification and bad judgment. Deciding to focus on quantitative metrics can lead to missing some of the company’s aspects. Those include a potential for future growth or intangible assets. It can lead to undervaluing some companies and missing out on great opportunities
  • Short-term perspective. While this approach can identify great prospects, it can miss out on promising companies facing short-term setbacks
  • Challenging in today’s market. Finding stocks with very low prices, like net net value stocks can be challenging
  • Time-consuming research. Researching a company’s fundamentals, and market conditions can be a demanding and time-consuming task
  • Psychological barriers. This approach demands discipline which can be difficult to retain during periods of market volatility
  • Misalignment with investor goals. Graham’s strategy does not apply to investors who are looking for aggressive growth.

How to Incorporate NAV Into Your Investment Strategy

With the use of Graham’s net current asset value, you can gain significant returns on often disregarded companies. But, since it has its downsides there are other factors to consider. There is no magic formula for using this approach but this is how we see it

Use NCAV to identify companies with low-value stocks. Compare the current stock price with NCAV to calculate the potential discount on stock price.

Perform a deeper analysis. NCAV is only a screening tool. For better results, there are other methods and factors you can rely on. Look for an earning potential and chances for growth. Analyze historical and projected revenue, profitability, and market share. Through it, you can assess the long-term assets of the company.

Analyze how the company operates. Identify its business model, what is its competitive landscape, and the company’s advantages in it. These factors can have a positive impact on the long-term success of the company. Check the track record, experience, and competence of the management team. A good team will have a vision for the company.

Examine financial health and other risk factors beyond current liabilities and assets. Focus on the cash flow and debt levels.

This is a deeper analysis but also incorporates other valuation methods. With the help of tools like DCF analysis and P/E ratios, you can get a clearer picture of a company’s financial value. This way you can also check the first indications that you got with the help of NAV.

Do not stop there, and search for qualitative information. Go through news articles, industry reports, investor presentations, and other sources. These can be a great way to gain insight into a company’s current market standings, reputation, and future potential.

To stay on top of things do not forget to create a margin of safety. If the current stock price is low, try to gain net net value of stocks. The larger the discount the lower the investment risk. But, while NCAV will allow you to lower the risk, do not forget to diversify your investments.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Using NAV

Although Graham with NCAV offered a valuable tool it comes with common pitfalls. You do not want to end up losing money even from discounted stocks if you can avoid it. This strategy has been in use for decades and these are the most common issues that investors endure:

  • Confusing NAV with absolute value

Often investors take NAV as the true market value of the company. They tend to forget that NAV represents the value of the company based on current assets and current liabilities. To find out the true value of the company, the investor needs to consider its future earning potential, current market sentiment, and intangible assets.

Sometimes stocks with low value are just bad business. You may see it as a bargain, but when you add other factors, you can often see that these companies do not have a future. Although net net stock values are tempting, stock selection is a serious process that goes much deeper than the price itself.

  • Not identifying future potential

Some companies have strong competitive advantages and potential for major earnings but still earn a low NAV valuation. This is due to NAV’s focus on short-term financial health. That is why we recommended deeper analysis. NAV is only the first tool for investigation. Take those results with a pinch of salt.

  • Utilizing NAV to complex companies

Net current asset value is often not suitable for companies with significant hard assets or liabilities. When analyzing these companies, look for valuation methods that suit them.

  • Making crucial decisions based on NCAV analysis

Net current asset value is a valuable tool, but avoid making deal-breaking decisions based on it. Complement it with fundamental and qualitative analysis of the company. Investigate other factors like company management, its business model, and the toughest competition. These can have a major impact on the attractiveness of a stock.

  • Ignoring market dynamics

Stock prices are often influenced by market sentiment and investor psychology. Market conditions can have a major impact on the price of the stocks, and it can reflect on the NAV. In some cases, the NAV analysis will give bad results, and you will end up with stocks that trade below NAV.

  • Neglecting other risk factors

The NAV evaluation helps you to identify stocks with low value, but it doesn’t tell you why they are so cheap. Other risks, like high debt levels, legal issues, or problems in the industry can cause low value of the stocks.

FAQs

What is the NCAV Valuation?

Net current asset value is a metric used in different valuation approaches. Ben Graham utilized it in his trademark value investing approach. It is used to identify massively undervalued stocks that can be perceived as a liquidation value.

To calculate NCAV you need to subtract total current liabilities from the current assets of the company from the company’s balance sheet. With this calculation, you get the value of the share in case the company is immediately liquidated.

With the use of net current asset value, you identify stocks with an even bigger discount than when using NAV. With this comes a greater margin of safety, and risk is minimized.

But, it comes with its share of potential issues. If you make investment decisions based on NCAV you may end up with worthless stocks of a bad company. When using NCAV conduct a deeper analysis to identify all the aspects of the company. Only then you can make a sound investment decision.

What is Graham’s Stock Valuation?

Ben Graham didn’t develop a universal formula for evaluating stocks. His stock valuation process is made of several analytical techniques and valuation metrics. Key aspects that Graham referred to when evaluating stocks were:

  • Focusing on intrinsic value. Graham advocated stock investing that focused on finding stocks below their intrinsic value
  • Utilizing net asset value. Graham frequently used NAV, and especially net current asset value (NCAV) as a starting point for identifying undervalued stocks. By calculating NCAV he got the liquidation value of the company
  • Margin of safety. Graham combined NCAV with the margin of safety. It provided him a hedge against potential downturns in the market
  • Qualitative analysis. Graham was known for his emphasis on quantitative analysis and metrics like NCAV. But, he always pointed out that investors need to combine quantitative with qualitative analysis. That includes assessing the management team, and business model of the company, identifying competitive advantages and potentials for long-term growth
  • Utilizing several valuation methods. What investors often overlook is that NCAV is only a first step in the valuation of the company. To paint a clearer picture it is essential to combine the NCAV with DCF analysis and P/E ratios.

Final Thoughts

If you have been reading some of Graham’s books it must have left a solid impression. Investors often find his investment approaches down to earth and approachable. One of his favorite techniques is net asset value and without it, it is difficult to understand his investing strategies.

Benjamin Graham knew that net net stocks were often bad. Companies didn’t have perspective, and they have major long-term liabilities. But, he saw these low-valued stocks as a starting point. From there he dug deeper looking for potential. He conducted a deeper fundamental analysis in search of a chance. In case he found it, he knew that per-share value would rise in due time.

From this, we wanted to address the issue of these often dead stocks. Once you calculate NCAV stocks, do not stop there. These doubtful accounts can have potential but you need to identify them. Fundamentally good companies will eventually get a share price rise, but you will need patience and time.

 

HFA Padded

The post above is drafted by the collaboration of the Hedge Fund Alpha Team.

Leave a Comment