John Huber – 3 Paths To Finding Value Stocks [Slides]

HFA Padded
HFA Staff
Published on

John Huber – The MicroCap Conference Philadelphia 2016

[timeless]

John Huber – 3 Paths To Finding Value Stocks

John Huber Brief Bio

  • Founder, Portfolio Manager at Saber Capital Management, LLC
  • Author of the Blog BaseHitInvesting.com, where I discuss my investing ideas
  • Saber is a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) that manages separate accounts for clients using a value investing approach
  • Saber emphasizes aligned incentives (John Huber invests alongside clients)

Saber’s Investment Strategy

Saber’s strategy is to make investments in high-quality, well-managed businesses at attractive prices.

Qualities I Look For:

  • Businesses I Understand
  • Growing Intrinsic Value (High ROIC)
  • Durability (Predictable Cash Flow)
  • Shareholder-friendly Management
  • Margin of Safety (Value)

A Common Sense Approach to Investing

“Your goal as an investor should simply be to purchase, at a rational price, a part interest in an easily-understandable business whose earnings are virtually certain to be materially higher five, ten and twenty years from now. Over time, you will find only a few companies that meet these standards — so when you see one that qualifies, you should buy a meaningful amount of stock…

“…Put together a portfolio of companies whose aggregate earnings march upward over the years, and so also will the portfolio’s market value.”

-Warren Buffett, 1996 Shareholder Letter

[buffett]

3 Paths to Finding Value

Three ways to locate value in stocks:

  1. Information Advantage
  2. Analytical Advantage (Thinking Differently)
  3. Time Arbitrage

Path #1: Information Advantage

Information Advantage: Finding information that others don’t have

  • This was how Buffett made a sizable amount of money in the 1950’s
  • Spinoffs/Special Situations (Joel Greenblatt made 50% annual returns in special situations using information he located that others didn’t have)
  • Small-caps (“hidden gems”)
  • However, it is now much easier to uncover information in today’s world (thus minimizing this advantage)

Buffett’s advantage in the early years was simply looking for bargains that others weren’t:

  • Western Insurance – Good Business valued at less than 1 P/E (see pg 185 of Snowball)
  • http://basehitinvesting.com/buffetts-early-investments/ (When Buffett found it, it had $16 of earnings and stock price that traded between $12 and $20 per share)
  • Buffett was up 75% in 1951, mostly because of GEICO. He put 65% of his small portfolio and the stock roughly doubled. He sold to buy Western Insurance, which also went on to double.

Path #2: Thinking Differently

Taking the same information and interpreting it differently:

  • There is no piece of information about Apple that isn’t freely available
  • Yet it traded at 90 in January, 110 in March, 90 in May, 110 in September
  • Two various potential interpretations of its high margins:
  1. One view: Apple is commodity hardware manufacturer that will see its margins erode
  2. Alternate view: Apple is a consumer brand which is the reason it has achieved high margins to begin with
  • Market does a poor job at judging long-term probabilities
    • Great compounders like WMT, WFC, SBUX, FAST, BRK, HD, GOOG, AMZN, PCLN all remained undervalued for a decade or more (many compounded at 20% annually for decades)
    • Even after they were widely accepted to be great companies with outstanding competitive positions, high returns on capital, attractive unit economics, and a long runway, the market still priced them “cheap” (i.e. allowed shareholders to invest at prices that subsequently yielded outstanding results, even as P/E ratios appeared high).
  • Why does the market often undervalue great businesses?

Two key reasons:

  • Market is better at analyzing short-term data points than it is when it comes to analyzing long-term fundamentals (the focus on the next few quarters deemphasizes what is important about the next 5 years; e.g. all the best engineers want to work at Google or Facebook, not Yahoo)
  • People often interpret the same set of information in very different ways

See the full slides below.

HFA Padded

The post above is drafted by the collaboration of the Hedge Fund Alpha Team.

Leave a Comment