United Development Funding (UDF) Total Ponzi Scheme, Worth Zero: HaymanVW Staff
We first reported this United Development Funding story long time ago, after which shares had dropped 70% or so, shares are down 7.45% in early trading today. Despite the fact the Hayman Capital did not respond to our requests for comments we retracted details at the request of Hayman after it went up mainly that Hayman is trying to get the DOJ, FBI, SEC etc to shut the company down. Now Bass has put up a website. See below for more.
Letter From Kyle Bass of Hayman Capital Management on exposing United Development Funding IV (UDF).
At Hayman Capital, we attempt to identify market inefficiencies and invest around opportunities created by those inefficiencies. Last year, we took a short position in United Development Funding (UDF) IV. Our research showed that United Development Funding exhibited characteristics consistent with a Ponzi scheme, the size and scope of which exceeded a billion dollars.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) describes a Ponzi scheme, in part, as “an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors.”
Kyle Bass – Similarities between a ponzi scheme and how United Development Funding IV (UDF) operates
This is consistent with, in many ways, how United Development Funding IV (UDF) operates:
- UDF is using new investor money to pay existing investors. When UDF’s first fund faltered, UDF used money from a second entity – a public affiliate, registered with the SEC – to bail out the first fund. UDF management has been trying to cover its tracks ever since, by perpetuating a Ponzi-like real estate scheme across multiple funds.
- UDF management is misleading investors. UDF management has been distorting its poor track record and the financial condition of its public SEC-registered affiliates dating back to the financial crisis.
- UDF management is preying on “Mom and Pop” retail investors, using the complexity of real-estate backed loans and a UDF-controlled web of related entities to obscure the fact that UDF is using new investors’ money to make payments to existing investors, and thereby perpetuating the scheme.
After years of mismanagement, the United Development Funding IV structure has begun to implode. Evidence of UDF’s dire situation includes a series of defaults, bankruptcy petitions, lawsuits, key resignations – including that of UDF’s audit firm, a key UDF director, and the CFO of UDF’s largest borrower – followed by UDF’s own overdue admission that it has been the subject of an SEC investigation since April 2014.
Today, as a consequence of mismanagement and concealed losses, United Development Funding IV faces significant bankruptcy risk, which would leave its shares virtually worthless.
The research on this website exposes how a Texas real estate developer built a billion dollar house of cards and why it is now on the verge of collapse. If you take the time to review the facts on this site, we believe you will come to a similar conclusion.
Chief Investment Officer and Principal
Hayman Capital Management L.P.
See more below
Hayman: Case Study on Irregular UDF Loan Patterns
Hayman’s Case Study presentation demonstrates how loans to UDF’s largest borrower regularly do not guarantee any cash (principle or interest), are extended without fees and accrue larger and larger balances for years.
Hayman: Fact Sheet on UDF
Download and read Hayman's multi-page overview of UDF's scheme.
Hayman: Case Study on How the Scheme Works
Hayman's case study presentation breaks down how the UDF scheme works.
Hayman: A High Flying UDF Conflict of Interest
The attached analysis shows that the CEO of UDF, Hollis Greenlaw, and the CEO of UDF’s largest borrower, Mehrdad Moayedi, co-own a private jet.
LEAVE A COMMENT
You must be logged in to post a comment.