U.S. politicians from New York to California are calling for public pensions to shed hundreds of millions of dollars in investments tied to Russia. So far, the retirement funds aren’t moving quickly to divest. In many cases, they can’t.
Q4 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more
The funds have relatively small exposure, but unwinding such assets is complex and could mean losses as they are trading at deep discounts and liquidity is scarce. Many of the largest retirement systems, which invest billions for teachers and other public servants, are adopting a patient approach.
“Considering that Russia amounts to about 2% of the global economy, whether a pension fund or other institutional investor would want to get out of an entire index fund in order to divest Russia holdings would be a questionable approach,” said Keith Brainard, research director of the National Association of State Retirement Administrators.
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the largest U.S. public pension, “supports the people of Ukraine who are suffering,” Chief Executive Officer Marcie Frost said in an statement.
But less than 1% of its $473.6 billion portfolio is in Russian-linked assets. It includes mostly stocks or index funds, as well as real-estate investments and private equity, worth in total about $900 million to $1.1 billion. The system isn’t taking precipitous action. Instead, it’s merely “monitoring current events and will take action as appropriate to protect the interests of our members,” Frost said.
The California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the second-biggest U.S. public pension, said it too is closely following developments and will abide by relevant sanctions. Calstrs, as the plan is known, said less than $500 million of its $319.8 billion portfolio is invested in Russia.
Even if pensions did quickly dump Russia-linked investments, sanctions and illiquid markets have made selling a fraught exercise. Finding buyers or even a venue in which to trade has become difficult. And securities that do change hands do so at steep discounts. A $1.5 billion bond issued by Russian oil producer Lukoil PJSC — held by many of the biggest U.S. and European investment houses — plunged Monday to 39 cents on the dollar from more than 90 cents less than two weeks ago.
Still, Russia-linked assets aren’t a major part of most U.S. pension portfolios, according to Orray Taft, a managing principal at Meketa Investment Group, which advises them on investments. Funds are unlikely to take immediate action, he said: “The sanctions right now are going to be what’s driving actions.”
Colorado Fund
Despite stirring statements from officials, only a few pensions have exited Russian-linked holdings. The $61 billion Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association divested $7.2 million investment in Sberbank, according to Governor Jared Polis. That’s 0.01% of the fund.
“We cannot continue to provide financial support to a regime that so brazenly disregarded international law and launched such an indefensible attack,” Polis said in a statement Friday.
Georgia officials identified holdings in iShares MSCI Russia, an exchange-traded fund that invests in a range of companies. The state plans to be fully out by midweek, said spokesperson Katie Byrd, who didn’t have details on the size of that investment.
“Most holdings of Russian assets by public pension funds are likely to be in index funds or other funds. rather than as individual direct investments, which makes it a lot more difficult to unwind,” said Brainard.
But some states are running for the exits nonetheless. Last week, the Pennsylvania Treasury Department, which directly manages nearly $40 billion, began selling off $2.9 million invested in Russian companies. They included mostly energy firms, with a few telecoms and banks, according to spokesperson Samantha Heckel. The state has completely divested from 28 of the 31.
Pennsylvania’s Public School Employees’ Retirement System said it too is reviewing its portfolio, adding that Russia- and Belarus-linked investments add up to $300 million, or one-half of 1% of its $72 billion portfolio.
Connecticut Treasurer Shawn Wooden, who is tasked with overseeing the state’s $47 billion retirement system, said he directed his team to divest the fund’s $218 million in Russia-domiciled stocks and bonds.
California, Maryland
Many states have begun a flurry of portfolio-combing and course-recalculation.
California Governor Gavin Newsom’ s office is evaluating possible actions and policies. Legislators introduced a bill Monday that would require the state, Calpers and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System to divest from Russian assets, and block state contracts for any company doing business with Russia.
Treasurer Fiona Ma, who sits on the boards of Calpers and Calstrs, said she supports divestment of Russian assets, as well as from local governments’ pensions.
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan directed agencies to review contracts, procurements and holdings and Comptroller Peter Franchot, who chairs the pension system, called for divesting. The system has about $96 million in Russian investments out of $69.3 billion in assets. That’s down from $197 million on Feb. 18.
Washington Governor Jay Inslee said Monday that agencies must end contracts with Russian state companies or institutions. That said, the Washington State Investment Board isn’t changing its strategy, as it doesn’t have direct or actively managed exposure to Russian investments, according to spokesperson Chris Phillips.
Credit Raters’ Concerns?
In Massachusetts, a group of lawmakers led by Republicans is asking the state treasurer to dump Russia-linked assets and Democratic State Senator Walter Timilty introduced a divestment bill. The $101.3 billion Massachusetts pension had about $140 million in exposure to Russia as of Feb. 25.
Illinois and New Jersey lawmakers are proposing similar legislation.
On Sunday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul ordered a stop to state business and investments in Russia and the $279.7 billion Common Retirement Fund is assessing its options. The same day, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander called for ridding five municipal pension funds of Russia-linked holdings. But that amounts only to $271 million, less than 0.1% of their $274 billion.
So far, credit raters aren’t concerned.
“We expect any changes to asset allocation to take time and that the pension plans’ expected return and risk profile will be minimally impacted,” said Todd Kanaster, a director in S&P public finance.
‘Tacit Approval’
Some state pensions, including those of North Carolina and Louisiana, have no plans to divest, saying their tainted holdings are minimal.
But even if exposure is small, symbolism is important, officials elsewhere said.
“Continuing to invest our state pension funds in Russian companies constitutes tacit approval of Russia’s deplorable actions,” a bipartisan group of lawmakers wrote Monday to Massachusetts’ treasurer.
Divesting “will send a clear message that the Commonwealth condemns Putin’s actions and supports the people of Ukraine.”
Read the full article here by Fola Akinnibi, Advisor Perspectives.
